In the Estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall v. the State of Texas (In the Estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 11, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00919-CV ——————————— IN THE ESTATE OF J. HUGH WHEATFALL, DECEASED
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Grimes County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 8866
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Isaiah Wheatfall, has two appeals pending before this Court in
appellate cause numbers 01-22-00919-CV and 01-22-00920-CV. On March 9,
2023, appellant filed a letter with this Court stating that he only wants to pursue his
appeal pending in appellate cause number 01-22-00920-CV and requesting that the
Court dismiss his appeal pending in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV. We construe appellant’s March 9, 2023 letter as a motion to dismiss his appeal pending
in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV.1
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of
conference stating that appellant conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer,
with appellee, Theresa DeBose, regarding the relief requested in the motion. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party
has expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal
pending in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),
43.2(f). We dismiss any other motions pending in appellate cause number
01-22-00919-CV as moot. Appellant’s appeal in appellate cause number
01-22-00920-CV remains pending before the Court.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
1 We note that appellant, in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On February 16, 2023, appellant was notified that he had failed to pay the required fees in both of his pending appeals. In his March 9, 2023 letter, appellant indicated that he would not being paying the required fees in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV. Under such circumstances, this Court may dismiss appellant’s appeal pending in appellate cause number 01-22-00919-CV for nonpayment of all required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-j-hugh-wheatfall-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.