In the Estate of Haffeke

Baltimore City Circuit Court

In the Estate of Haffeke

1 Balt. C. Rep. 95

DecidedMarch 15, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 95 (In the Estate of Haffeke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Estate of Haffeke, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 95 (Md. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

DENNIS, J.

I am of the opinion that the words in the article of co-partnership, “the said Haffeke contributing all the rights to manufacture under the said letters patent,” constitute only a license to use the said patents, and such a license is not assignable, in tbe absence of appropriate language to show a clear intent that it shall be so assignable, e. g'., as by the use of the words “assigns,” “successor,” &c. In this1 case there are no words to show such intent, and the prayer of the petition must be refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, J.

I am of the opinion that the words in the article of co-partnership, “the said Haffeke contributing all the rights to manufacture under the said letters patent,” constitute only a license to use the said patents, and such a license is not assignable, in tbe absence of appropriate language to show a clear intent that it shall be so assignable, e. g'., as by the use of the words “assigns,” “successor,” &c. In this1 case there are no words to show such intent, and the prayer of the petition must be refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-haffeke-mdcirctctbalt-1890.