in the Estate of Frederick Bankston

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2018·No. 09-18-00155-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00155-CV ____________________

IN THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK BANKSTON

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-33174-P ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record. The

appellant, Sharita Jones, did not file a response. It appears that the appellant did not

file a statement of inability to afford payment of costs and is not entitled to proceed

without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. There being no satisfactory

explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Estate of Frederick Bankston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in the Estate of Frederick Bankston (in the Estate of Frederick Bankston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.