in the Estate of Frederick Bankston
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00155-CV ____________________
IN THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK BANKSTON
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-33174-P ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record. The
appellant, Sharita Jones, did not file a response. It appears that the appellant did not
file a statement of inability to afford payment of costs and is not entitled to proceed
without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. There being no satisfactory
explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Estate of Frederick Bankston (in the Estate of Frederick Bankston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.