In the Case of a Road in Radnor & Newtown
This text of 5 Binn. 612 (In the Case of a Road in Radnor & Newtown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Many objections have been made to the proceedings in this case, but we shall confine our opinion to one, namely, that Mr. Ewing, one of the petitioners, was appointed a reviewer, and signed the report which was confirmed by the Court. We make no doubt but this appointment was merely accidental. The Court did not happen to have the names of the petitioners before them, when they appointed the reviewers. But it was an irregularity which [613]*613cannot be overlooked. We are of opinion that this objection is fatal., and therefore the proceedings must be quashed.
Proceedings quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Binn. 612, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-case-of-a-road-in-radnor-newtown-pa-1813.