In State v. King, ____ S.W.2D ____ (Tenn. 1998), Our Supreme Court
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED APRIL 1998 SESSION August 27, 1998
Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, * C.C.A. # 01C01-9707-CR-00237 Clerk Appellate Court
Appellee, * DAVIDSON COUNTY
VS. * Hon. Thomas H. Shriver, Judge
MARCUS L. NELSON, * (Aggravated Robbery)
Appellant. *
CONCURRING OPINION
In State v. King, ____ S.W.2d ____ (Tenn. 1998), our supreme court
ruled that the charge on parole eligibility and early release was acceptable because
the jury was provided the instruction on an "information only" basis. In my view,
juries should not be allowed to weigh and consider parole eligibility in the context of
innocence or guilt. Any error in giving the instruction in this instance, however, was
harmless beyond doubt. The proof is overwhelming that the defendant committed
the crimes for which he was convicted. So long as the jury understands that the
statute at issue plays no part in the determination of guilt or innocence to any of the
crimes defined in the instructions, convictions should be upheld on appeal.
Otherwise, the ruling of this court in State v. Jason M. Weiskopf, No. 02C01-9611-
CR-00381 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Feb. 4, 1998), app. filed, (May 6, 1998),
should control.
__________________________________ Gary R. Wade, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In State v. King, ____ S.W.2D ____ (Tenn. 1998), Our Supreme Court (In State v. King, ____ S.W.2D ____ (Tenn. 1998), Our Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.