In Re:Estate of McAleer of: McAleer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re:Estate of McAleer of: McAleer

201 A.3d 724

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 4, 2019·No. 345 WAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Do the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrines protect communications between a trustee and counsel from discovery by beneficiaries when the communications arose in the context of adversarial proceedings between the trustees and beneficiaries?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Do the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrines protect communications between a trustee and counsel from discovery by beneficiaries when the communications arose in the context of adversarial proceedings between the trustees and beneficiaries?

In Re:Estate of McAleer of: McAleer, 201 A.3d 724 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

201 A.3d 724 (In Re:Estate of McAleer of: McAleer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related