In re Zweibon

188 A.D.2d 65, 594 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1702

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent, Bertram Zweibon, was admitted to practice by this Court on November 24,1954.

On July 23, 1992, respondent pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court, New York County, to one count of grand larceny in the second degree, a felony. Upon entry of said plea, respondent was automatically disbarred (Matter of Swirsky, 103 AD2d 195; Matter of David, 145 AD2d 150). Accordingly, the petition [66]*66of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeking an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys should be granted.

Respondent’s requests, unsupported by precedent, to have this Court include in its disbarment order provisions deviating from the prescriptions and prohibitions set forth in section 90 (2) of the Judiciary Law and section 603.13 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR), are denied.

Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Petition granted and respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately; and respondent’s requests to have this Court include in its disbarment order provisions deviating from the prescriptions and prohibitions set forth in section 90 (2) of the Judiciary Law and section 603.13 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR), are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Zweibon, 188 A.D.2d 65, 594 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

188 A.D.2d 65 (In re Zweibon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Swirsky
103 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re David
145 A.D.2d 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)