In re Zuleyka D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Zuleyka D.

69 A.D.3d 850, 893 N.Y.2d 772

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[851]*851We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel for the mother that there Eire no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Robert David L., 16 AD3d 508 [2005]).

To vacate the order of fact-finding and disposition, the father was required to show that there was a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense (see Matter of Francisco R., 19 AD3d 502 [2005]). The father did not make the requisite showing (see Matter of Cassidy Sue R., 58 AD3d 744 [2009]).

The father’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[851]*851We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel for the mother that there Eire no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Robert David L., 16 AD3d 508 [2005]).

To vacate the order of fact-finding and disposition, the father was required to show that there was a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense (see Matter of Francisco R., 19 AD3d 502 [2005]). The father did not make the requisite showing (see Matter of Cassidy Sue R., 58 AD3d 744 [2009]).

The father’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

In re Zuleyka D., 69 A.D.3d 850, 893 N.Y.2d 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

69 A.D.3d 850 (In re Zuleyka D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related