In re Zukerberg

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 29, 2025
Docket25-BS-0362
StatusPublished

This text of In re Zukerberg (In re Zukerberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Zukerberg, (D.C. 2025).

Opinion

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 25-BS-0362

IN RE PAUL H. ZUKERBERG, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals BDN: 25-PD-008 Bar Registration No. 388152 DDN: 2024-D178

BEFORE: Beckwith and Deahl, Associate Judges, and Ruiz, Senior Judge.

ORDER (FILED—May 29, 2025)

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal its lodged petition on behalf of the Board on Professional Responsibility to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), and it appearing that respondent, the Board, and Disciplinary Counsel agree that an indefinite disability suspension should be imposed, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave is granted and the lodged petition is filed under seal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is granted, respondent Paul H. Zukerberg is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia on the grounds of disability, effective immediately, and any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be held in abeyance. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14(g) and 16, relating to suspended attorneys. It is No. 25-BS-0362

FURTHER ORDERED that within ten days from the date of this order, respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), with the court and the Board, and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re Zukerberg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zukerberg-dc-2025.