In re Zook
This text of 144 B.R. 489 (In re Zook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
In order to facilitate the payment of taxes by the trustee under the terms of their chapter 13 plan, the debtors filed a claim on behalf of the Idaho State Tax Commission (STC). The STC then filed an objection to the claim, contending the filing of the claim by the debtors was improper and unauthorized. The taxes apparently accrued both before and after the debtors’ chapter 13 filing, but were not payable until April 15, 1992. The debtors’ chapter 13 petition was filed on April 15, 1992.
The claim was filed by the debtors under the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 501(c)1 and [490]*490F.R.B.P. 3004 authorizing a debtor to file a claim on behalf of the creditor.2 STC argues, however, the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1305 preclude a debtor from filing a claim for a taxing entity, and cites the case of In re Glover, 107 B.R. 579 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1989).
The Glover case holds a debtor may not modify a confirmed chapter 13 plan to recognize a postpetition claim filed by the debtor on behalf of the creditor. The basis of the decision was the fact the claim was a postpetition claim not authorized for inclusion in a chapter 13 plan under 11 U.S.C. § 1305(a) as a tax or administrative expense.
In the instant case, the claim is for post-petition taxes, and is thus authorized as a postpetition claim for treatment in the debtor’s plan under Section 1305(a). STC does not dispute the amount of the claim, and shows no prejudice as a result of the debtors’ filing of the claim. The filing of a claim by a debtor for a taxing entity under 11 U.S.C. § 501(c) and F.R.B.P. 3004 is not specifically prohibited by any statute or rule.
Accordingly, it is,
ORDERED:
The objection of the Idaho State Commission to the claim filed by the debtors on its behalf is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 B.R. 489, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1381, 1992 WL 219768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zook-idb-1992.