In re Zonies
This text of 195 A.3d 130 (In re Zonies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-385, concluding that Daniel B. Zonies of Cherry Hill, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation), RPC 1.8(e) (improper financial assistance to a client), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6(recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that Daniel B. Zonies is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.3d 130, 235 N.J. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zonies-nj-2018.