In re Zonies

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Zonies

67 A.3d 619, 214 N.J. 106, 2013 WL 3305769, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 599

DecidedJune 26, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.3d 619 (In re Zonies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zonies, 67 A.3d 619, 214 N.J. 106, 2013 WL 3305769, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 599 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-363, concluding that DANIEL B. ZONIES of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to [107]*107promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL B. ZONIES is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-363, concluding that DANIEL B. ZONIES of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to [107]*107promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL B. ZONIES is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.3d 619, 214 N.J. 106, 2013 WL 3305769, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zonies-nj-2013.