In Re Zollicoffer's Will
This text of 50 N.C. 309 (In Re Zollicoffer's Will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with Iris Honor, before whom the issue of devisa/oit ml non was tried, that after tlie script was signed b,y tlie testator and subscribed, in Ms presence, by tw© *311 attesting witnesses, the proposal made by one of them, and assented to by the testator, to take the script to a lawyer, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the provisions wore properly expressed, did not prevent it from being a complete will. Assuming that the purpose of the testator was to alter the script, if the lawyer should so advise, there was nothing said or done, at the time, to render the act of publication incomplete. The testator had done all the law required to make a complete will, before the proposal was made by the witness, and being complete, the will could be revoked only in one of the modes prescribed in the statute, viz., by burning, cancel-ling, tearing, or obliterating the same, or by some other will or codicil in writing, or by some other writing, properly executed for the purpose. See Eev. Code, chap. 119, section 22. The judgment of the Court below, pronounced in favor of the script as the last will of the testator, is affirmed.
Pee Cueiam, Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 N.C. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zollicoffers-will-nc-1858.