In re Zodda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Zodda

121 A.D.2d 666, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58656

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 666 (In re Zodda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zodda, 121 A.D.2d 666, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law § 90 [7]), the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against Victor P. Zodda, an attorney and counselor-at-law, admitted to practice in this court on March 13, 1942, based upon acts of professional misconduct set forth in the Committee’s report attached to its petition dated May 20, 1986.

On the court’s own motion, based upon the conduct as alleged in the petition and apparently admitted by the respondent, Victor P. Zodda, is suspended from the practice of law, pending the further order of this court.

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 900 Ellison Avenue, Westbury, New York 11590 is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law § 90 [7]), the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against Victor P. Zodda, an attorney and counselor-at-law, admitted to practice in this court on March 13, 1942, based upon acts of professional misconduct set forth in the Committee’s report attached to its petition dated May 20, 1986.

On the court’s own motion, based upon the conduct as alleged in the petition and apparently admitted by the respondent, Victor P. Zodda, is suspended from the practice of law, pending the further order of this court.

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 900 Ellison Avenue, Westbury, New York 11590 is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 666, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zodda-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack