In Re Zmv

174 P.3d 1076, 217 Or. App. 154
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 19, 2007
DocketC050027MC A129327
StatusPublished

This text of 174 P.3d 1076 (In Re Zmv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Zmv, 174 P.3d 1076, 217 Or. App. 154 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

174 P.3d 1076 (2007)
217 Or. App. 154

In the Matter of Z.M.V., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Z.M.V., Appellant.

C050027MC; A129327.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Record and Briefs November 2, 2007.
Decided December 19, 2007.

Susan D. Isaacs, Beaverton, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SERCOMBE, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs or is a danger to herself or others because of her mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Z. M. V.
174 P.3d 1076 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 P.3d 1076, 217 Or. App. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zmv-orctapp-2007.