In re Zem

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Zem

667 A.2d 694, 142 N.J. 638, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1437

DecidedDecember 11, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 667 A.2d 694 (In re Zem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zem, 667 A.2d 694, 142 N.J. 638, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1437 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court on September 27, 1995, its decision concluding that BONNIE M. ZEM of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on her honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of RPC 8.4(b), and that the suspension should be suspended because of mitigating factors;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition for review of the decision of the Disciplinary Review Board;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for review is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that BONNIE M. ZEM is hereby reprimanded for committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on her honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of RPC 8.4(b); and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI