In re Zelma B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Zelma B.

39 A.D.2d 573, 332 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 573 (In re Zelma B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zelma B., 39 A.D.2d 573, 332 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 7 of the Family Court Act, order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1971, which adjudged appellant to be a person in need of supervision and placed her on probation, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a de novo fact-finding hearing on the allegations contained in the petition. The record shows that at the fact-finding hearing, appellant was not given the required warning of her right to remain silent (Family Ct. Act, § 741). Munder, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Grulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 7 of the Family Court Act, order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1971, which adjudged appellant to be a person in need of supervision and placed her on probation, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a de novo fact-finding hearing on the allegations contained in the petition. The record shows that at the fact-finding hearing, appellant was not given the required warning of her right to remain silent (Family Ct. Act, § 741). Munder, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Grulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 573, 332 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zelma-b-nyappdiv-1972.