In re Zaruba

832 A.2d 317, 177 N.J. 564
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 1, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-098, concluding that KAREL L. ZARUBA of NAPLES, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, for violating RPC 5.6(b) (offering or making an agreement in which a restriction on the lawyer’s right to practice is part of the settlement of a controversy between private parties) and RPC 8.4(a) (violating or attempting to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct; knowingly assisting or inducing another to do so, or doing so through the acts of another), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KAREL L. ZARUBA is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Zaruba, 832 A.2d 317, 177 N.J. 564 (N.J. 2003).

832 A.2d 317 (In re Zaruba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gormally
57 A.3d 1098 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)