In Re Zark
This text of 14 A.3d 747 (In Re Zark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-236, concluding that ALAN ZARK of BAYONNE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should *232 be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client informed about the status of the matter) and RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to client), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that ALAN ZARK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.3d 747, 205 N.J. 231, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zark-nj-2011.