In re Zappala

565 A.2d 441, 523 Pa. 134, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 24, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 565 A.2d 441 (In re Zappala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Zappala, 565 A.2d 441, 523 Pa. 134, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 374 (Pa. 1989).

Opinion

[135]*135ORDER

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 24th day of October, 1989, following oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition of the Court Administrator of Pennsylvania, seeking declaratory relief be and is hereby GRANTED and that upon the filing of declaration of candidacy for retention election pursuant to Section 15(b) of Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution the name of Justice Stephen A. Zappala be placed on the ballot for retention election in November, 1991, and if successfully retained to begin his retention term of office on the first Monday of January, 1992. Sprague v. Casey, 520 Pa. 38, 550 A.2d 184 (1988).

ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sprague v. Casey
550 A.2d 184 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 A.2d 441, 523 Pa. 134, 1989 Pa. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zappala-pa-1989.