In re Zagari

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Zagari

724 A.2d 930

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 4, 1999

DocketNo. 210 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 724 A.2d 930 (In re Zagari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zagari, 724 A.2d 930 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated January 11, 1999, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses in[931]*931curred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice CAPPY did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated January 11, 1999, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses in[931]*931curred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice CAPPY did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 A.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zagari-pa-1999.