In re Zachary R.F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Zachary R.F.

37 A.D.3d 1072, 827 N.Y.S.2d 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 2007

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 A.D.3d 1072 (In re Zachary R.F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Zachary R.F., 37 A.D.3d 1072, 827 N.Y.S.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, J.), entered September 9, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant [1073]*1073to Family Court Act article 3. The order, after a hearing, adjudged that respondent committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child (seven counts) and forcible touching (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; see also Matter of Benjamin S.A., 302 AD2d 979 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 505 [2003]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Gorski, Lunn, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, J.), entered September 9, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant [1073]*1073to Family Court Act article 3. The order, after a hearing, adjudged that respondent committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child (seven counts) and forcible touching (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; see also Matter of Benjamin S.A., 302 AD2d 979 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 505 [2003]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Gorski, Lunn, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.3d 1072, 827 N.Y.S.2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-zachary-rf-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack