In Re Zachary Brice Knox v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided April 24, 2026·No. 03-26-00325-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00325-CV

In re Zachary Brice Knox

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM IRION COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of a temporary

restraining order (TRO) entered by the trial court on March 27, 2025, denying relator possession

and access to the subject child in the underlying suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

After relator filed his petition, however, the trial court on April 6, 2026, entered an order on

relator’s then-pending motion to vacate the TRO vacating in part and modifying in part the

complained-of order and setting a hearing for temporary orders in the underlying suit. Because

the April 6, 2026 order vacated the complained-of provisions of the TRO, relator’s complaints

about are now moot. Accordingly, we dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus for lack of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: April 24, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Zachary Brice Knox v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Zachary Brice Knox v. the State of Texas (In Re Zachary Brice Knox v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.