In Re Z. Q. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Z. Q. v. the State of Texas (In Re Z. Q. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00469-CV
IN RE Z.Q., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 315th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 86707
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023, relator Z.Q. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Leah Shapiro, presiding judge of the 315th District Court of Harris County (1) to rule on a “motion for a merits ruling on an application for writ of habeas corpus”; and (2) to rule on a motion for a hearing “in order to fully develop the facts and arguments necessary to make a ruling on the constitutional claims.”
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Z. Q. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-z-q-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.