In re Yusem

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Yusem

716 A.2d 530, 155 N.J. 595, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1124

DecidedSeptember 11, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 716 A.2d 530 (In re Yusem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Yusem, 716 A.2d 530, 155 N.J. 595, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1124 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on August 11,1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD S. YUSEM of SOMERVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD S. YUSEM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[596]*596ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on August 11,1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD S. YUSEM of SOMERVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD S. YUSEM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[596]*596ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 A.2d 530, 155 N.J. 595, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yusem-nj-1998.