In re Yubriel I.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Yubriel I.

309 A.D.2d 576, 765 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 309 A.D.2d 576 (In re Yubriel I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Yubriel I., 309 A.D.2d 576, 765 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 20, 2002, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute assault in the second degree, and placing him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family [577]*577Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The court properly credited testimony that disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 20, 2002, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute assault in the second degree, and placing him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family [577]*577Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The court properly credited testimony that disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 576, 765 N.Y.S.2d 505, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yubriel-i-nyappdiv-2003.