In re Young
162 F. 912, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 366
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 25, 1908
DocketNo. 1,724
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 162 F. 912 (In re Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Young, 162 F. 912, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 366 (E.D. Pa. 1908).
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
Judge Holland has twice decided the question raised by the bankrupt’s motion to dismiss the specifications to his discharge. Following the authority of Re Ginsburg, 130 Fed. 627, 12 Am. Bankr. Rep. 459, and Re Grant (D. C.) 135 Fed. 889, the motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Desiderio
209 B.R. 342 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
In Re Farhid
171 B.R. 94 (N.D. California, 1994)
Frederick Snare Corp. v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.
195 F. Supp. 639 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 F. 912, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-paed-1908.