In re Young

E.D. New York

In re Young

96 F. 606, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 355

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedAugust 9, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 F. 606 (In re Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Young, 96 F. 606, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 355 (E.D.N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, District Judge.

The motion herein is denied. The fees are an incident of the lien. When the lien fails, the incident fails also. It is not apparent that the estate has been benefited by an expense of $236, made in an attachment proceeding in an action to collect the sum of $392.50. However, the main question passed upon ⅛ the nonexistence of a lien. If the petitioners desire to review the question, the trustee will retain a sufficient sum to meet the claim, if the appellate court should consider the demand or any part thereof justly payable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, District Judge.

The motion herein is denied. The fees are an incident of the lien. When the lien fails, the incident fails also. It is not apparent that the estate has been benefited by an expense of $236, made in an attachment proceeding in an action to collect the sum of $392.50. However, the main question passed upon ⅛ the nonexistence of a lien. If the petitioners desire to review the question, the trustee will retain a sufficient sum to meet the claim, if the appellate court should consider the demand or any part thereof justly payable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 F. 606, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-nyed-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack