In re Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Young

94 A.D.2d 599, 465 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18511

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 599 (In re Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Young, 94 A.D.2d 599, 465 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18511 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Nancy J. Young was admitted to practice in the First Department on June 28, 1965. Respondent acknowledges that she is the subject of an investigation by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee. In her affidavit, dated June 14,1983, she admits that she has misappropriated over $300,000 from various clients. While the respondent has made some restitution, she still owes a considerable sum of money to those clients. Respondent attributes her personal misconduct to a personal crisis which she experienced in the 1973-1974 period.

In her affidavit, respondent Young tenders her resignation (22 NYCRR 603.11). She indicates that her resignation is made freely and voluntarily without coercion or duress of any kind and that she is fully aware of the implications and consequences of her resignation. She admits that if a disciplinary proceeding were commenced against her based upon the afore-mentioned allegations, she could not defend herself on the merits successfully.

[600]*600Under the circumstances herein, respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that her name be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law effective August 31, 1983.

Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Asch and Milonas, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s resignation accepted and filed and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective August 31, 1983.

[The following page is 601]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Nancy J. Young was admitted to practice in the First Department on June 28, 1965. Respondent acknowledges that she is the subject of an investigation by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee. In her affidavit, dated June 14,1983, she admits that she has misappropriated over $300,000 from various clients. While the respondent has made some restitution, she still owes a considerable sum of money to those clients. Respondent attributes her personal misconduct to a personal crisis which she experienced in the 1973-1974 period.

In her affidavit, respondent Young tenders her resignation (22 NYCRR 603.11). She indicates that her resignation is made freely and voluntarily without coercion or duress of any kind and that she is fully aware of the implications and consequences of her resignation. She admits that if a disciplinary proceeding were commenced against her based upon the afore-mentioned allegations, she could not defend herself on the merits successfully.

[600]*600Under the circumstances herein, respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that her name be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law effective August 31, 1983.

Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Asch and Milonas, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s resignation accepted and filed and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective August 31, 1983.

[The following page is 601]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 599, 465 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-nyappdiv-1983.