In re Young Min Kim

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Young Min Kim

113 A.3d 1215, 221 N.J. 438, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 552

DecidedMay 20, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.3d 1215 (In re Young Min Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Young Min Kim, 113 A.3d 1215, 221 N.J. 438, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 552 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-131 concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that YOUNG MIN KIM of FORT LEE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b) and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) and (f) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that YOUNG MIN KIM is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-131 concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that YOUNG MIN KIM of FORT LEE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b) and Rule l:20-3(g)(3) and (f) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that YOUNG MIN KIM is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.3d 1215, 221 N.J. 438, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-min-kim-nj-2015.