In Re: Young-Bey

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2011
Docket11-1202
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Young-Bey (In Re: Young-Bey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Young-Bey, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1202

In Re: JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cv-02722-JFM)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Young-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey M. Young-Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the

district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied

Young-Bey’s petition on March 14, 2011. Accordingly, because

the district court has recently decided Young-Bey’s case, we

deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed

in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Young-Bey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-young-bey-ca4-2011.