In re York Silk Mfg. Co.

188 F. 735, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 8, 1911
DocketNo. 1,719
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 188 F. 735 (In re York Silk Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re York Silk Mfg. Co., 188 F. 735, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266 (M.D. Pa. 1911).

Opinion

WITMER, District Judge.

After hearing the argument of counsel, reading and considering the opinion filed by j. Edward Vander-sloot, Esq., referee, the exceptions thereto and the record in this case, it is, upon consideration, adjudged and decreed that the findings of the referee in favor of the trustee and general creditors disallowing the claim of the commonwealth, as preferred, and in rejecting the claim for penalties, are in accordance with the law, and the referee’s conclusions and order are affirmed.

The well-considered opinion of the learned referee is adopted as the opinion, conclusions, and order of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. J. G. Menihan Corp.
201 Misc. 1037 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
People of Illinois ex rel. Ames v. Oppenheimer
85 F.2d 1002 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
In Re Messenger's Merchants Lunch Rooms
85 F.2d 1002 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
In re Follansbee Bros.
10 F. Supp. 496 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)
United Gas Improv. Co. v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 1382 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.
8 F.2d 859 (Second Circuit, 1925)
Pennsylvania v. York Silk Mfg. Co.
192 F. 81 (Third Circuit, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F. 735, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-york-silk-mfg-co-pamd-1911.