In re York Silk Mfg. Co.

188 F. 735, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania·Decided July 8, 1911·No. No. 1,719·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

WITMER, District Judge.

After hearing the argument of counsel, reading and considering the opinion filed by j. Edward Vander-sloot, Esq., referee, the exceptions thereto and the record in this case, it is, upon consideration, adjudged and decreed that the findings of the referee in favor of the trustee and general creditors disallowing the claim of the commonwealth, as preferred, and in rejecting the claim for penalties, are in accordance with the law, and the referee’s conclusions and order are affirmed.

The well-considered opinion of the learned referee is adopted as the opinion, conclusions, and order of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re York Silk Mfg. Co., 188 F. 735, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266 (M.D. Pa. 1911).

188 F. 735 (In re York Silk Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. J. G. Menihan Corp.
201 Misc. 1037 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
People of Illinois ex rel. Ames v. Oppenheimer
85 F.2d 1002 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
In Re Messenger's Merchants Lunch Rooms
85 F.2d 1002 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
In re Follansbee Bros.
10 F. Supp. 496 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)
United Gas Improv. Co. v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 1382 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Nolte v. Hudson Nav. Co.
8 F.2d 859 (Second Circuit, 1925)
Pennsylvania v. York Silk Mfg. Co.
192 F. 81 (Third Circuit, 1911)