in Re Yolanda Turner, Tenants

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 2009
Docket01-09-00002-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Yolanda Turner, Tenants (in Re Yolanda Turner, Tenants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Yolanda Turner, Tenants, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Opinion issued April 23, 2009





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas



NO. 01-09-00002-CV



IN RE YOLANDA TURNER, Relator



Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Prohibition



MEMORANDUM OPINION



By petition for writ of prohibition, relator, Yolanda Turner seeks a writ of prohibition from this Court (1) directing the trial court (1) to vacate his December 19, 2008 default judgment and (2) directing the trial court to cease and desist from participating in any suit or cause of action involving the relator.

Texas courts have held that a court's jurisdiction to issue "all other writs" is limited to cases in which that court has actual jurisdiction over a pending proceeding. See Lesikar v. Anthony, 750 S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding); Faherty v. Knize, 764 S.W.2d 922, 923 (Tex. App.--Waco 1989, orig. proceeding); Kantor v. Herald Pub. Co., 632 S.W.2d 656, 658 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1982, orig. proceeding). This Court does not have actual jurisdiction over a pending proceeding. Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition requiring Judge Cagle to vacate the December 19 default judgment and desist from participating in any suit or cause of action involving this case. Lesikar, 750 S.W.2d at 339. Furthermore, relator has failed to put forth any argument that she lacks an adequate remedy at law to be entitled to a writ of prohibition. See In re Richardson, 252 S.W.3d 822, 826 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding).

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). All outstanding motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes and Higley.

1. The Honorable Jack Cagle presiding. The underlying proceeding is Andover Place Apts. v. Yolanda Turner, no. 928396 (County Civil Court at Law Number One, Harris, County Tex.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Richardson
252 S.W.3d 822 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Kantor v. HERALD PUB. CO., INC.
632 S.W.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Faherty v. Knize
764 S.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Lesikar v. Anthony
750 S.W.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Yolanda Turner, Tenants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yolanda-turner-tenants-texapp-2009.