In re Yetter

Montana Supreme Court

In re Yetter

507 P.2d 534, 161 Mont. 544, 1973 Mont. LEXIS 632

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 6, 1973

DocketNo. 12447

StatusPublished

This text of 507 P.2d 534 (In re Yetter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Yetter, 507 P.2d 534, 161 Mont. 544, 1973 Mont. LEXIS 632 (Mo. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

[545]*545ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This is an original proceeding wherein Gerald P. Yetter sought a writ of review to review the proceedings in the district court of Gallatin County in Cause No. 16413, entitled Yetter vs. Yetter, wherein petitioner was found guilty of contempt by a judgment of said court dated the 29th day of January, 1973. Counsel was heard ex parte and an order was issued, directed to the district court, requiring that it certify to this Court the proceedings hereinbefore referred to, and staying all proceedings until the further order of the Court.

Upon the return day counsel for petitioner and the court appeared and were heard in oral argument. The certified proceedings have been reviewed by this Court and it is now advised thereon.

The relief sought by such review not appearing to be required nor proper it is hereby ordered that the same be denied and our stay order vacated and this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[545]*545ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This is an original proceeding wherein Gerald P. Yetter sought a writ of review to review the proceedings in the district court of Gallatin County in Cause No. 16413, entitled Yetter vs. Yetter, wherein petitioner was found guilty of contempt by a judgment of said court dated the 29th day of January, 1973. Counsel was heard ex parte and an order was issued, directed to the district court, requiring that it certify to this Court the proceedings hereinbefore referred to, and staying all proceedings until the further order of the Court.

Upon the return day counsel for petitioner and the court appeared and were heard in oral argument. The certified proceedings have been reviewed by this Court and it is now advised thereon.

The relief sought by such review not appearing to be required nor proper it is hereby ordered that the same be denied and our stay order vacated and this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 P.2d 534, 161 Mont. 544, 1973 Mont. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yetter-mont-1973.