In re Yessenia F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Yessenia F.

213 A.D.2d 263, 624 N.Y.S.2d 823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 263 (In re Yessenia F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Yessenia F., 213 A.D.2d 263, 624 N.Y.S.2d 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of [264]*264disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered June 20, 1994, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (Matter of Michael D., 109 AD2d 633, 634, affd. 66 NY2d 843), the record supports the trial court’s determination that respondent committed the crime of attempted assault in the third degree since she intended to inflict physical injury upon the complainant (see, People v Delgado, 167 AD2d 181, lv denied 77 NY2d 905). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of [264]*264disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered June 20, 1994, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (Matter of Michael D., 109 AD2d 633, 634, affd. 66 NY2d 843), the record supports the trial court’s determination that respondent committed the crime of attempted assault in the third degree since she intended to inflict physical injury upon the complainant (see, People v Delgado, 167 AD2d 181, lv denied 77 NY2d 905). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 263, 624 N.Y.S.2d 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yessenia-f-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack