In re Yates

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Yates

531 S.E.2d 287, 340 S.C. 80, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 91

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 19, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner was indicted for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. He pled guilty to simple assault and was fined $376.00. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. /s/ James E, Moore, J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. /s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Petitioner was indicted for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. He pled guilty to simple assault and was fined $376.00. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. /s/ James E, Moore, J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. /s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

In re Yates, 531 S.E.2d 287, 340 S.C. 80, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 91 (S.C. 2000).

Pincite

531 S.E.2d 287 (In re Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related