In re Yasias A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Yasias A.

248 A.D.2d 273, 670 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3194

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 273 (In re Yasias A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Yasias A., 248 A.D.2d 273, 670 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, following a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first and second degrees and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations as to the credibility and reliability of testimony, and we reject appellant’s claim that the court materially misunderstood the testimony of appellant’s witness.

Concur — Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, following a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first and second degrees and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations as to the credibility and reliability of testimony, and we reject appellant’s claim that the court materially misunderstood the testimony of appellant’s witness.

Concur — Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 273, 670 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yasias-a-nyappdiv-1998.