In re Yarborough

744 S.E.2d 499, 403 S.C. 365, 2013 WL 2718162, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 145
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 8, 2013
DocketAppellate Case No. 2011-205454; Appellate Case No. 2011-200046
StatusPublished

This text of 744 S.E.2d 499 (In re Yarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Yarborough, 744 S.E.2d 499, 403 S.C. 365, 2013 WL 2718162, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 145 (S.C. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

On September 1, 2000, the Court transferred petitioner to incapacity inactive status. In the Matter of Yarborough, 342 S.C. 387, 536 S.E.2d 870 (2000). On December 18, 2000, the Court disbarred petitioner from the practice of law. In the Matter of Yarborough, 343 S.C. 316, 540 S.E.2d 462 (2000).

Pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, and Rule 28, RLDE, of Rule 413, SCACR, petitioner petitions the Court for reinstatement to the practice of law and to be transferred to active status. After hearings addressing both petitions, the Committee on Character and Fitness issued Reports and Recommendations recommending the Court grant both petitions.1

The petitions are granted subject to the following conditions:

1. before he shall be reinstated, petitioner shall execute a contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers on such terms as required by Lawyers Helping Lawyers to provide for petitioner’s continued sobriety;2
2. for the two years immediately following his reinstatement, petitioner shall comply with his proposed “plan” to facilitate his return to the practice of law;3
[366]*3663. for a period of two years following his reinstatement, petitioner shall be mentored by James H. Price, III, Esquire, on terms required by the “plan;” Mr. Price shall file quarterly reports with the Commission on Lawyer Conduct which assess petitioner’s “plan;” and
4. completion of the Legal Ethics and Practice Program Ethics School and Trust Account School and the Advertising and Trust Account School within one (1) year of his reinstatement; within ten (10) days of completion of the programs, petitioner shall provide proof of completion to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct.

Petitioner shall be sworn-in and reinstated to the South Carolina Bar during the next regularly-scheduled swearing-in ceremony to be held in May 2013.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J /s/Costa M. Pleicones, J. /s/Donald W. Beatty, J. /s/John W. Kittredge, J. /s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Yarborough
536 S.E.2d 870 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
In re Yarborough
540 S.E.2d 462 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 S.E.2d 499, 403 S.C. 365, 2013 WL 2718162, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yarborough-sc-2013.