in Re: XTC Cabaret (Dallas), Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2021
Docket05-21-00794-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: XTC Cabaret (Dallas), Inc. (in Re: XTC Cabaret (Dallas), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: XTC Cabaret (Dallas), Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Order entered September 17, 2021

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00794-CV

IN RE XTC CABARET (DALLAS), INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-13178

ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia

Before the Court is relator’s September 13, 2021 petition for writ of

mandamus challenging the trial court’s August 20, 2021 order granting in part real

party in interest’s motion to compel discovery.

On the court’s motion, we STAY the portions of the trial court’s August 20,

2021 order concerning Requests for Production Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, 25, 30, 38, 41, 42

and Interrogatory No. 15 to the following extent.1 We STAY the trial court’s order

to the extent that it requires relator to produce information regarding incidents that

do not involve assaults, armed robbery, or firearm discharge. We also STAY the

1 Justice Schenck would have granted the requested stay in full. trial court’s order to the extent that it requires relator to produce any documents,

incident reports, investigative materials, and policies or procedures for a timeframe

going beyond the two-year period preceding the January 1, 2019 incident. The trial

court’s order shall not be stayed to the extent that it requires relator to produce

information regarding assaults, armed robbery, or firearm discharge that occurred

in the two-year period preceding the January 1, 2019 incident.

We also STAY the trial court’s order to the extent that it requires relator to

comply with Request for Production No. 25 concerning relator’s gross income in

2017 and 2018.

This stay shall remain in effect pending resolution of this original

proceeding.

We also request that real party in interest and respondent file their responses,

if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by October 6, 2021.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: XTC Cabaret (Dallas), Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-xtc-cabaret-dallas-inc-texapp-2021.