In re XL Fleet (Pivotal) S'holder Litig.
This text of In re XL Fleet (Pivotal) S'holder Litig. (In re XL Fleet (Pivotal) S'holder Litig.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
KATHALEEN ST. J. MCCORMICK LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734
August 21, 2024
Michael J. Barry Patricia L. Enerio Casimir O. Szustak Elizabeth A. DeFelice Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. Emily A. Letcher 123 Justison Street, 7th Floor Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP Wilmington, DE 19801 300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 200 Wilmington, DE 19801 William M. Lafferty Ryan D. Stottmann Rachel R. Tunney Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP 1201 N. Market St. Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: In re XL Fleet (Pivotal) S’holder Litig., C.A. No. 2021-0808-KSJM
Dear Counsel:
This decision resolves the August 2, 2024 request of Defendant Spruce Power
Holding Corp. (formerly known as XL Fleet Corporation) (“XL Fleet”) for leave to
move for summary judgment.1 XL Fleet argues that Count IV for breach of the
certificate of incorporation can be resolved by summary judgment because the
undisputed evidence confirms that it did not breach the certificate of incorporation.2
The plaintiffs oppose the motion and argue that the evidence is far from undisputed.3
1 C.A. No. 2021-0808-KSJM, Docket (“Dkt.”) 154.
2 Id. at 4.
3 Dkt. 163 at 3. C.A. No. 2021-0808-KSJM August 21, 2024 Page 2 of 3
“There is no right to a summary judgment.”4 “Even where the facts are not in
dispute, a court may decline to grant summary judgment where a more thorough
exploration of the facts is needed to properly apply the law to the circumstances.” 5
“When an ultimate fact to be determined is one of motive, intention or other subjective
matter, summary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate.”6 The court may “decline to
decide the merits of the case in a summary adjudication where it is not reasonably
certain that there is no triable issue.”7 This court has refused requests for leave to
file motions for summary judgment where such proceedings “are apt to waste, rather
than conserve, the resources of the parties and the court.”8
Typically, motions for summary judgment require a court to dive deeply into a
paper record without the benefit of live witnesses explaining the significance of that
record. This exercise requires a substantial investment of judicial resources. With
trial and the attendant benefits of live witness testimony around the corner, I am
4 Stone & Paper Invs., LLC v. Blanch, 2020 WL 6373167, at *1 (Del. Ch. Oct. 30, 2020)
(internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Telxon Corp. v. Meyerson, 802 A.2d 257, 262 (Del. 2002)). 5 In re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., Litig., 1995 WL 106520, at *5 (Del. Ch. Mar. 9, 1995)
(citations omitted). 6 Cont’l Oil Co. v. Pauley Petroleum, Inc., 251 A.2d 824, 826 (Del. 1969) (citations
omitted). 7 Unbound P’rs Ltd. P’ship v. Invoy Hldgs. Inc., 251 A.3d 1016, 1024 (Del. Super.
2021) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Parexel Int’l (IRL) Ltd. v. Xyomic Pharms., Inc., 2020 WL 5202083, at *4 (Del. Super. Sept. 1, 2020)) (interpreting parallel rule of the Delaware Superior Court). 8 Orloff v. Shulman, 2007 WL 1862742, at *1 (Del. Ch. June 20, 2007); see also Blanch,
2020 WL 6373167, at *1 (denying leave to file a motion for summary judgment filed in “close proximity to trial”). C.A. No. 2021-0808-KSJM August 21, 2024 Page 3 of 3
dubious of arguments that summary judgment motions will create efficiencies.
Nevertheless, I approached XL Fleet’s request for leave to move for summary
judgment open to the possibility that there might be good reasons to undertake such
an effort in this action.
I have now studied the request for leave and conclude that there are no good
reasons to permit a motion for summary judgment. The parties’ letters speak to
factually rife issues, and I am far from convinced that the issues raised are not triable.
The request for leave to move for summary judgment is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kathaleen St. J. McCormick
Chancellor
cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re XL Fleet (Pivotal) S'holder Litig., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-xl-fleet-pivotal-sholder-litig-delch-2024.