In re Wysoker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wysoker

783 A.2d 243, 170 N.J. 7, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1274

DecidedOctober 30, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 783 A.2d 243 (In re Wysoker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wysoker, 783 A.2d 243, 170 N.J. 7, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1274 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board, having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-219 concluding that JACOB WYSOKER of NEW BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1951, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JACOB WYSOKER is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the [8]*8further Order of the Court, effective November 23, 2001; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board, having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-219 concluding that JACOB WYSOKER of NEW BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1951, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JACOB WYSOKER is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the [8]*8further Order of the Court, effective November 23, 2001; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 A.2d 243, 170 N.J. 7, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wysoker-nj-2001.