In Re Wyatt
This text of 110 S.W.3d 511 (In Re Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING
On April 1, 2003, we denied the relators’ motion for a writ of prohibition without an opinion. Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(d). They have filed a motion for rehearing, requesting clarification of the reason for our denial. A writ of prohibition may properly be used by this Court only to protect our jurisdiction. In re Salas, 994 S.W.2d 422, 423 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, orig. proceeding). Its use is limited to cases in which this Court has actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding. Id. The relators’ petition does not assert any manner in which our jurisdiction is in jeopardy of being lost due to the events about which they are complaining.
Relators’ motion for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 S.W.3d 511, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4585, 2003 WL 21233852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wyatt-texapp-2003.