In re Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum

535 N.E.2d 1369, 41 Ohio St. 3d 724, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 1322

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1989·No. 89-346·Published

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court upon the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the application of petitioner Joseph L. Colburn, Jr. for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to permit petitioner to testify in D.D. 88-14, Disciplinary Counsel v. Colburn, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is hereby, denied. See In re Colburn (1987), 30 Ohio St. 3d 141, 30 OBR 452, 507 N.E. 2d 1138.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court upon the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the application of petitioner Joseph L. Colburn, Jr. for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to permit petitioner to testify in D.D. 88-14, Disciplinary Counsel v. Colburn, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is hereby, denied. See In re Colburn (1987), 30 Ohio St. 3d 141, 30 OBR 452, 507 N.E. 2d 1138.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

In re Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum, 535 N.E.2d 1369, 41 Ohio St. 3d 724, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 1322 (Ohio 1989).

Pincite

535 N.E.2d 1369 (In re Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related