In re Wright

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Wright

287 A.2d 553, 130 Vt. 111, 1972 Vt. LEXIS 236

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 21, 1972

DocketNo. 150-71

StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.2d 553 (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wright, 287 A.2d 553, 130 Vt. 111, 1972 Vt. LEXIS 236 (Vt. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant requested that the evidence in this proceeding be taken in closed hearing. The committee took the opposite position and directed that the hearings be public. The ruling was then certified to this Court for review.

The state has asked that, except for extraordinary situations, such hearings be ruled open to the public as a matter of law. We view the matter differently. The authority of the committee as triers of the fact is to be equated to that of a trial court, including the ■ discretionary power to dispose of issues relating to the conduct of proceedings before it. It is for that tribunal to decide, in the light of any legal and due process considerations relating to matters improper,' scandalous or impertinent, whether such proceedings, at any point when the issue is raised, shall, in whole or in part, be open or closed to the public.

The ruling of the committee is affirmed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant requested that the evidence in this proceeding be taken in closed hearing. The committee took the opposite position and directed that the hearings be public. The ruling was then certified to this Court for review.

The state has asked that, except for extraordinary situations, such hearings be ruled open to the public as a matter of law. We view the matter differently. The authority of the committee as triers of the fact is to be equated to that of a trial court, including the ■ discretionary power to dispose of issues relating to the conduct of proceedings before it. It is for that tribunal to decide, in the light of any legal and due process considerations relating to matters improper,' scandalous or impertinent, whether such proceedings, at any point when the issue is raised, shall, in whole or in part, be open or closed to the public.

The ruling of the committee is affirmed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.2d 553, 130 Vt. 111, 1972 Vt. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-vt-1972.