In re Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Wright

93 Ohio St. 3d 1241

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 31, 2001

Docket01-1552

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1241 (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wright, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1241 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Coshocton App. No. 00CA27. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the court of appeals’ opinion that the appeal involves termination of parental rights. The appellant failed to state in the notice of appeal that the appeal involved termination of parental rights as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(B)(1). Furthermore, appellant failed to timely file this appeal within twenty days from the entry of judgment as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coshocton App. No. 00CA27. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the court of appeals’ opinion that the appeal involves termination of parental rights. The appellant failed to state in the notice of appeal that the appeal involved termination of parental rights as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(B)(1). Furthermore, appellant failed to timely file this appeal within twenty days from the entry of judgment as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-ohio-2001.