In re Wright
This text of 194 A.3d 495 (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 2:15-15(a), a presentment recommending that Carolyn E. Wright , a Judge of the Superior Court, be publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 1 Rule 1.1 (a judge shall maintain high standards of conduct to preserve the integrity, impartiality, and independence of the judiciary); Canon 2, Rule 2.1 (a judge shall act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary and to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety); and Canon 2, Rule 2.3(A)(a judge is prohibited from lending the prestige of the judicial office to advance the personal or economic interests of the judge or others);
And respondent, through counsel, having accepted the findings and recommendation for discipline of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct and having waived her right to the issuance of an *496Order to Show Cause and a hearing before the Supreme Court;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the findings and recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct are adopted, and Carolyn E. Wright, a Judge of the Superior Court, is hereby publicly reprimanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 A.3d 495, 235 N.J. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-nj-2018.