In Re Wright

946 A.2d 1021, 194 N.J. 503
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 5, 2008·No. D-125 September Term 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB-07-392, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that KATRINA F. WRIGHT of WILLINGBORO, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KATRINA F. WRIGHT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Wright, 946 A.2d 1021, 194 N.J. 503 (N.J. 2008).

946 A.2d 1021 (In Re Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Burak
946 A.2d 1021 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)