In re Wright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wright

846 A.2d 592, 179 N.J. 417, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 456

DecidedApril 26, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 846 A.2d 592 (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wright, 846 A.2d 592, 179 N.J. 417, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 456 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court a presentment recommending that E. RONALD WRIGHT, a Judge of the Municipal Court of New Brunswick, be reprimanded for violations of Canons 1 (A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary), 2A and 2B (A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6)(engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute);

And respondent, through counsel, having waived his right to a hearing before the Supreme Court and having consented to the imposition of the sanction recommended by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the presentment of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct is adopted and E. RONALD WRIGHT is hereby reprimanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court a presentment recommending that E. RONALD WRIGHT, a Judge of the Municipal Court of New Brunswick, be reprimanded for violations of Canons 1 (A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary), 2A and 2B (A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6)(engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute);

And respondent, through counsel, having waived his right to a hearing before the Supreme Court and having consented to the imposition of the sanction recommended by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the presentment of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct is adopted and E. RONALD WRIGHT is hereby reprimanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 A.2d 592, 179 N.J. 417, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-nj-2004.