In re Wright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Wright

710 A.2d 1010, 154 N.J. 7, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 592

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 N.J. 35 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 17, 1998·Published

Opinion

[8]*8ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on May 19, 1998, having filed with the Court it decision concluding that DOROTHY L. WRIGHT of GREEN BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence)' and RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOROTHY L. WRIGHT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[8]*8ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on May 19, 1998, having filed with the Court it decision concluding that DOROTHY L. WRIGHT of GREEN BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence)' and RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOROTHY L. WRIGHT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Wright, 710 A.2d 1010, 154 N.J. 7, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 592 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

710 A.2d 1010 (In re Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.