In re Wright
This text of In re Wright (In re Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0000620 11-APR-2014 10:09 AM
SCPW-14-0000620
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN THE MATTER OF FRANCES ANNE WRIGHT, Petitioner.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Wilson, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of petitioner Frances Anne Wright’s letter to the court, which she describes as a petition, and which the appellate clerks’ office filed as a petition on March 25, 2014, it appears that the requested relief is not available from this court. See HRS § 386-88 (Supp. 2013). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 11, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Wright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wright-haw-2014.